New York Times Endorses Michael Bloomberg

I've already commented on the Times site to much the same effect as many of the comments so far. I am furious that Bloomie has decided to unilaterally negate the term limits that we voted on twice and then says something about restoring the status quo after his third term. Can we just say "arrogance" to the point of being obnoxious and does this mean he agrees on term limits except as they apply to himself since he has apparently achieved godlike status?



I remember angrily hanging up on one of his telephone campaign messages which began "This is Ed Koch for Mayor Mike Bloomberg". Ed is the one who caused term limits to be imposed in the first place!
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost